- Get our e-newsletter
- Follow us via …
- How to get involved
GLOBALIZATION AND THE DISMANTLING OF CANADIAN DEMOCRACY, VALUES AND SOCIETY
PCDForum Article # 17 Release Date March 10, 1996
by Maude Barlow
Many people know about how the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank force developing countries into the unregulated free-market global economy by a process of structural adjustment. Countries seeking new loans to meet old debt obligations must privatize social security, deregulate their transportation and resource sectors, allow transnational corporations to displace domestic industry, undermine or destroy collective bargaining, and cut public services such as education and health to the bone. In effect, they are told that global capital will call in its debt if they do not acquiesce to its demands.
What is less known is that the same thing is happening in many of the so-called developed countries. The threat is different-global capital threatens to pull investment and manufacturing out of these countries if they do not get their way-and the tools they use-free trade agreements like the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)-are different as well. My country, Canada, provides a striking example of how corporate-dominated globalization brought my country to it knees and dismantled a social infrastructure that took a hundred years to create.
A former Mexican Ambassador once said, "Canada is the solution looking for a problem." With a vast land mass, a harsh climate, three founding national identities-Aboriginal, French, and multi-cultural English-speaking-and a sparse population, largely scattered along the border of the biggest superpower in the world, our ancestors knew that they had to be creative in order to survive as a nation-state.
Our ancestors knew that their survival depended on building a culture of interdependence, and so they built ribbons of common purpose-economic, social, and cultural institutions that forged a nation-state out of the wilderness. Most crucially, we built a welfare system not based on individual charity, but on the notion that social security, particularly health care, is a right of citizenship and should be universally accessible to all Canadians. Strong national standards for what we called our "social safety net" promoted equality, worked toward eliminating class and racial differences, and generated a sense of community.
Our modern social legacy was forged in the twin crucibles of the Great Depression and the Second World War. Capitalism was put on trial by the depression, as its massive failures became apparent in the work camps and bread lines of the 1930s. The same government that could not provide even basic care for its people was suddenly able to find all the money it needed to feed, clothe, house and employ them for war. When Canadians came back from that war, they demanded a country worthy of returning heroes, and what I call our "social nation-state" was born. Canadian business was forced to comply with progressive policies in a partnership contract with government and the Canadian people.
That has now changed. Beginning in the mid-1970s and dramatically accelerating during the 1980s, Canadian capital has gone global. Having escaped beyond the borders of nation-state law, it has called off its partnership with Canadian citizens. Led by a corporate lobby group, the Business Council on National Issues-modeled on the U.S. Business Roundtable and largely under the control of foreign corporations-big business in Canada launched an unprecedented assault on social programs, Canadian culture, full employment policies, and the notion of public services. Corporate Canada has government on trial, calling for its "re-invention" by allowing the private sector to take over wholesale in areas of public service.
The first step was to force consecutive governments to lower corporate taxes or face capital flight. Whereas in the 1960s, Canadian citizens and business contributed 50-50 to tax revenues collected, today Canadian citizens account for 92 percent of all tax revenues. Business contributes only 8 percent. As business has withdrawn its tax contribution, the Canadian government has fallen further and further into debt, as have governments all over the world. Corporate Canada has responded with a form of political terrorism, forcing governments to slash public infrastructure across the board. Privatization, deregulation, and decentralization are the rallying cries of big business. Their most important tool for forcing the transition from a social nation-state to a corporate nation-state have been a series of free trade agreements.
The NAFTA, and its predecessor, the Canadian-U.S. Free Trade Agreement, were fiercely contested in Canada. NAFTA is a social and economic constitution that overrides Canadian government law and acts as a charter of rights and freedoms for corporations. It requires the deregulation of the service sector, enshrines the intellectual property rights of corporations, removes virtually all control over foreign investment in Canada, promotes the privatization of public services, such as health and education, and contains no minimum protections for workers, social standards, health and safety measures, or the environment. It has forced Canada to realign its orientation from east-west to north-south, in essence, becoming part of a new borderless North American economy. Several hundred thousand jobs and many hundreds of manufacturing companies have been lost as a result to the low wage states south of our border.
In the election of 1993, Canadians took their rage out against former Conservative Prime Minister Brian Mulroney's wholesale endorsement of free trade and the corporate agenda, by reducing his party to just two members in the House of Commons. Jean Chretien's Liberals campaigned passionately against NAFTA and were elected on a progressive platform. However, in a distressing betrayal of democracy, one of their first acts upon taking office two years ago was to sign NAFTA.
They then proceeded to gut Canada's world-class social programs, break the collective bargaining agreement with their public sector workers, introduce legislation allowing industry to negotiate around environmental legislation, strip natural resource protection programs, enforce interprovincial free trade on the NAFTA model, severe trade from human rights, privatize the transportation sector, commercialize the cultural sector, and endorse world-wide free trade. No Canadian voted for this platform, but we got it anyway.
The accumulated effect of living in an unprotected global economy has had devastating results for most Canadians. We are creating a high unemployment, contingency workforce dependent on part-time, low-wage jobs with no security and few benefits. We are changing our class profile from an egg-with a large middle class-to a pear, with fewer Canadians controlling more of the wealth, and more and more of us falling out at the bottom. We now have an entrenched underclass and our middle class is shrinking. Child poverty hit a three-decade record in Canada-there are 51 percent more poor children living in Canada today than in 1989-the year the free trade deal between Canada and the United States was signed. Corporate profits, however, are soaring; a 360 percent increase in last year's fourth-quarter profits alone.
A neo-conservative government has just taken power in Ontario, my home province. They are closing battered women's shelters and half-way homes for prisoners, throwing welfare mothers unto the streets, and slashing funding to children's aid societies-behavior that would have been unheard of in our country a decade ago. When the previous Premier of the province was sworn in, he invited the public to hear him play the piano and participate in a sing-a-long. The Premier before that held his swearing-in on the front lawn of the Ontario legislature, where he personally served the public hot dogs and lemonade. It was a different story the day the current Premier, Mike Harris, was sworn in. A very small, select sea of suits, triple-security passes clutched in hand, were carefully screened for admission by the riot police who encircled the legislature, complete with billy clubs, mace, and attack dogs.
And so Canadians have entered the global economy, as have peoples all over the world; a global economy so divided by rich and poor that, as the Institute for Policy Studies has documented, 358 billionaires now hold a combined wealth equal to the annual income of nearly half of humanity; a global economy ruled by global corporations with more economic power than most nation-states; a global economy where powerful trade agreements protect the corporate abuse of 200 million child laborers; a global economy where corporations train Third World police forces to protect their property from disenfranchised local peasants, farmers, and workers, and call for laws making it illegal to criticize corporate behavior.
Canadian citizens are fighting back. My organization, a national, non-partisan, non-profit grass-roots movement of 55,000 members has launched a Citizens' Agenda for Canada movement. We believe that every person in this world has the right to productive and fulfilling employment, food, shelter, education, pensions, unemployment insurance, health care, universally accessible public services, a safe and clean environment, protected wilderness spaces; a right to the integrity of his or her culture, and the right to communicate freely. If governments will not recognize and defend these rights, we must act as citizens to restore them. No one of us acting alone can overcome the forces aligned against us. Together, however, we can create a moral vision and reclaim the power to give reality to our dreams.
To rebuild democracy we must start back at the roots-in our communities. The only way to fight is together. Across sectors, across countries, across race, gender and age lines, employed and unemployed, city and rural, we must find one another and realize that the movement we are creating is the only thing that comes between us and the global feudalism of the new economy. We must not accept the prevailing propaganda that globalization and corporate rule are inevitable. To say we have no choice is intellectual terrorism. Fair trade, full employment, co-operation, cultural diversity, democratic control, fair taxation, environmental stewardship, community, public accountability, equality, social justice: these are the touchstones of our vision and it is within our means-it is our right-to chose them.
_______________
Maude Barlow is national chairperson of the Council of Canadians, 904-251 Laurier Ave. W., Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5J6, Canada and a contributing editor of the PCDForum. This article was prepared and distributed by the PCDForum based on her presentation to the globalization teach-in convened by the International Forum on Globalization in Riverside Church, New York City November 10, 1995.
People-Centered Development Forum columns and articles may be reproduced and distributed freely with appropriate credits without prior permission.
Resources
- Books
- Media-Interviews
- Articles/Blogs/Reports
- Presentations
- Agriculture for a Living Earth
- Beyond the Global Suicide Economy
- Can the Global Economy be Fixed?
- Challenge for Higher Education
- Ecological Economics
- Election Reflection 2004
- Follow the Money
- GATE Hollywood Day Presentation
- GATE Hollywood Evening Presentation
- Green Party & the New Economy
- How to Liberate America
- Life after Capitalism
- New Economy Animation Script
- New Economy Policy Agenda
- Path to a Peace Economy
- Prophetic Mission
- Renewing the American Experiment
- SVN Living Economies
- Sacred Earth UBC
- Seattle Peace Vigil
- State of the Union 2004
- Step to Earth Community
- The EU & the New Economy
- The Living Economies Challenge
- The Prudent Investor
- The World We Want
- Trinity Wall Street Presentation
- U of Oregon Lecture Oct 2011
- U.S. Earth Charter Launch
- UN Yes!—Bretton Woods No!
- Whidbey Bioneers 2010
- Reports from Norway
- E-Newsletter Archive
- Music & Art
- Web Essays
- Reflections/Reports
- Information Service Archive
- 1990
- 1991
- NGOs AND THE UN CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
- LEADERSHIP FOR TRANSFORMATION: LESSONS FROM THE GULF WAR
- DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION: SOME BASIC ISSUES
- THE SUSTAINABLE PROJECT: A CONTRADICTION
- ELIMINATING UNDERDEVELOPMENT AT ITS SOURCE
- UNCED: UNASKED QUESTIONS
- LATIN AMERICA: FREE TRADE IS NOT THE ANSWER
- EAST AND SOUTH: CONVERGENT INTERESTS
- THE OTHER ECONOMIC SUMMIT: A PEOPLE'S AGENDA
- THE NEW ECONOMICS MOVEMENT
- GREEN GROWTH: A FALSE SOLUTION
- NGOS AND THE ELECTORAL PROCESS: PHILIPPINE PERSPECTIVES
- BEWARE THE SLOSHING OF LOOSE CAPITAL
- ECOLOGICAL STABILITY, SOCIAL JUSTICE AND FOREIGN ASSISTANCE
- COMMUNITY-CENTERED CAPITALISM: AN NGO ALTERNATIVE
- THE HOPE AND CHALLENGE OF PEOPLE'S FORUM 1991
- ECONOMIC ORTHODOXY AND THE POOR: THE CASE OF AUSTRALIAN AID
- ENVIRONMENT AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT: THE ASIAN REALITY
- SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: Reflections on Japan's Role
- THE IDEOLOGICAL ROOTS OF CRISIS IN AN ARCHIPELAGIC COUNTRY
- INTERNATIONAL ASSISTANCE: A PROBLEM POSING AS A SOLUTION
- 1992
- BEYOND THE CHATTER OF MONKEYS: GETTING TO ENVIRONMENTAL BASICS
- EDUCATION FOR GLOBAL CHANGE: A NEW AGENDA FOR DEVELOPMENT EDUCATORS
- THE UNISON SNORING OF SUPINE ECONOMISTS IN DEEP DOGMATIC SLUMBER
- TO IMPROVE HUMAN WELFARE, POISON THE POOR: THE LOGIC OF A FREE MARKET ECONOMIST
- SOUTH AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT AND THE THREAT OF FOREIGN AID
- CIVIL SOCIETY IS THE FIRST SECTOR
- HUMAN RIGHTS, SOCIAL JUSTICE, ECOLOGY AND EXPORT ORIENTED INDUSTRIALIZATION
- BUILDING A SOCIAL ENTERPRISE ECONOMY
- DETOXIFYING THE GREEN REVOLUTION
- GLOBAL CITIZEN'S DIPLOMACY: QUEST FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE
- REFLECTIONS ON UNCED: A NEW BEGINNING
- HAVING MORE BY CONSUMING LESS
- RESULTS OF RIO: AN EMERGING SOCIAL MOVEMENT
- GREEN DOLLARS MISS THE POINT
- THE EARTH SUMMIT: COMPETING VISIONS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER
- NEED MONEY FOR YOUR PROJECT? THREE PROVEN RULES
- NGOs AND THE UNCED FOLLOW-UP PROCESS: CONTINUING NEED FOR INDEPENDENT ACTION
- RETHINKING U.S. INTERNATIONAL ASSISTANCE AS IF PEOPLE AND ENVIRONMENT MATTER
- UNDP's HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT: OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT DOUBLE SPEAK
- DEVELOPMENT HERESY AND THE ECOLOGICAL REVOLUTION
- BEYOND MARKET VERSUS STATE
- SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: PROSPERITY WITHOUT GROWTH
- NGOs & the World Bank: An Open Letter
- THE PEOPLES' EARTH DECLARATION: A Proactive Agenda for the Future
- SOUTHEAST ASIA CONTRIBUTION TO THE EARTH CHARTER
- 1993
- FREE TRADE AND THE IMAGINARY WORLDS OF ECONOMIC MODELERS
- THE GREENING OF GLOBAL REACH
- WE ARE AFRICANS
- NAFTA: A BAD AGREEMENT
- SUSTAINABILITY REQUIRES NEW ECONOMIC CONCEPTS
- ECOLOGICAL RECOVERY AND THE FEMININE PRINCIPLE
- THE BACKWARD ONES
- Economic Restructuring Through Community and Employee Ownership
- NORTHERN LIFESTYLES: WHAT IS EQUITABLE & SUSTAINABLE?
- From Urban Sprawl to Sustainable Human Communities
- Creating a Community Economy
- Getting Prices Right: Only a Partial Answer
- The Global Economy A Bad Deal for Women
- Sustainability: Principles Behind the Vision
- GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENTALISTS: THE POOR FIGHT BACK
- BEYOND GROWTH TO MATURITY
- WHY NOT FAIR TRADE AGREEMENTS?
- THE PSYCHOLOGICAL ROAD TO “DEVELOPMENT”
- CORPORATE AGRIBUSINESS: MONOPOLIZING SUSTENANCE
- FROM ECONOMIC GROWTH TO QUALITY OF LIFE
- CITIES, TRADE AND ECOLOGICAL DEFICITS
- POWER, POVERTY, ECONOMIC INTEGRATION & BRETTON WOODS
- TOWARD A PEOPLE'S PACIFIC
- THE COMPASSIONATE AND THRIFTY UNIVERSE
- FREE TRADE AND THE AMERICAN DREAM
- Economy, Ecology & Spirituality
- Small Farmers & Globalization
- What If......?
- Economic Colonialism
- Development and the Youth Culture
- 1994
- Making Commerce Sustainable
- Good Protectionism
- A People's Agenda
- Serious about Sustainability
- Development for People
- Let's Develop Human Societies
- Family Friend Cities
- Anyone Home at WB?
- Rethinking Global Governance
- Overlooked Case of Job Protection
- The GATT and Democracy
- PCD Principles
- Dark Victory of the New World Order
- Saying No to Development
- Sustainable Livelihoods & the Social Crisis
- Sustainable Development: PCD Concensus
- Sustainable Development: Contrasting Views
- Int. Convention on Debt
- The Case Against Globalization
- 1995
- THIRD WORLD WOMEN CHALLENGE THE GIVEN
- SOCIAL CAPITAL
- DEVELOPMENT DISPLACEMENT: WHOSE NATION IS IT?
- MULTILATERAL DEVELOPMENT BANKS: WHO'S THE REAL BOSS?
- BUILDING CITIZENS' AGENDAS
- A WOMEN'S DEVELOPMENT AGENDA FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
- HABITAT II: PREPARING FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
- HELP THE POOR, SAVE THE ENVIRONMENT: ELIMINATE DEBT AND END FOREIGN AID
- ENVIRONMENTAL LENDING MAY BE HARMFUL TO THE ENVIRONMENT
- SUSTAINABILITY AND THE GLOBAL ECONOMY: BEYOND BRETTON WOODS
- THE CITIZENS' AGENDA FOR CANADA
- PRINCIPLES OF SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS
- THE COPENHAGEN ALTERNATIVE DECLARATION
- OUR CITIES, OUR HOMES
- WHAT'S AHEAD FOR THE WORLD BANK? THE BIG PICTURE
- A NOT SO RADICAL AGENDA FOR A SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL FUTURE
- PROPERTY RIGHTS VERSUS LIVING RIGHTS: DEFINING ISSUES FOR HABITAT II
- 1996
- WINNING IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY: CHILE'S DARK VICTORY
- ECONOMICS WITHOUT ETHICS: THE CRISIS OF SPIRITUALITY
- FOOD SECURITY FOR PEOPLE
- UNDERSTANDING MONEY
- THERE'S A DANGEROUS FLAW IN “GLOBAL ECONOMY” CONCEPT
- GLOBALIZATION AND THE DISMANTLING OF CANADIAN DEMOCRACY, VALUES AND SOCIETY
- ECO-HABITATS: FULFILLING A DREAM FOR HUMANITY
- LIMITS TO THE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF BUSINESS
- Profile of MARILYN MEHLMANN
- Profile of SARA LARRAIN R.
- Profile of VANDANA SHIVA
- 1997
- Political and Spiritual Awakening
- Rights of Money vs Persons
- Solutions Via Global Dialogue
- Money as a Social Disease
- Business Responsibility
- UN & the Corporate Agenda
- Profile of Nicanor "Nicky" Perlas
- Civil Society & Regional Security
- India's Popular Movements
- Learning Locally to Act Globally
- Why the Fuss About Stockholders?
- UN Partnerships
- Let's Try a Market Economy
- The UN Relationship to TNCs
